The Hadeeth (Hadith) and its Sciences
Commentary on Hadeeth
2534: How sound is the
hadeeth "Whoever visits my grave after I die, it
is as if he visited me when I was still alive"?
Question:
I was once told that Rasulullah(saw) has said
that visiting his grave after his death is the
same as visiting him when he was alive and that,
therefore, when we visit his grave in Madinah,
there is no harm in speaking to him as if he
were alive and requesting him to intercede on
our behalf with Allah. But I'm worried that this
might be `shirk'. Please answer soon; I hope to
go for an Umrah in the near future and visit his
grave too, insya Allah.
Answer:
Al-Daaraqutni reported in his Sunan
(2/278) with an isnaad from Haatib that the
Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him) said: "Whoever visits me
after I die, it is as if he visited me when I
was still alive…" This is a hadeeth which many
of the scholars of hadeeth judged to be false
and not to have been reported with a saheeh
isnaad from the Prophet (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him). Among the scholars who
voiced this opinion was al-Haafiz al-Dhahabi in
Lisaan al-Meezaan (4/285), in his
biography of one of the narrators, Haaroon ibn
Abi Qaz'ah. Al-Dhahabi said: "…Haaroon ibn Abi
Qaz'ah al-Madani [reported] from a man" _ about
visiting the grave of the Prophet (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him). Al-Bukhaari
said: "This is not to be accepted or followed."
Al-Haafiz Ibn Hajar said in Lisaan
al-Meezaan (6/217): "Al-Azdi said: `Haaroon
Abu Qaz'ah reports mursal ahaadeeth from a man
of Aal Haatib.' I [Ibn Hajar] say: from this we
understand that what he is referring to is
al-Azdi. Ya'qoob ibn Shaybah also classed him as
da'eef (weak)."
Al-Haafiz ibn Hajar also mentioned him in
al-Talkhees al-Habeer, in his comment on
the ahaadeeth of al-Raafa'i al-Kabeer (2/266).
He said, "In his isnaad is the unknown [majhool]
man" _ meaning a man from Aal Haatib.
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah said in
al-Tawassul wa'l-Waseelah (p. 134) about
this hadeeth: "It is obviously a lie that goes
against Islam. Anyone who visited him during his
lifetime and believed in him, was one of his
Companions, especially if he was among those who
migrated to join him or fought alongside him. It
is proven that he (peace and blessings of Allaah
be upon him) said: `Do not slander my
Companions, for by the One in Whose hand is my
soul, if any one of you were to spend gold equal
to the size of Uhud, it would not equal the
deeds of one of them, not even half of it.'
[Reported by al-Bukhaari and Muslim]. Anyone who
comes after the Sahaabah cannot be like the
Sahaabah by doing obligatory duties such as
Hajj, jihaad, the five daily prayers and sending
blessings upon the Prophet (peace and blessings
of Allaah be upon him), so how can he become
equal to them by doing something that is not
obligatory according to the consensus of the
Muslims? We are not even supposed to travel for
this purpose, in fact it is forbidden to do so.
However, travelling to the [Prophet's] Mosque,
and to al-Masjid al-Aqsaa [in Jerusalem], for
the purpose of praying there, is mustahabb
(encouraged), and travelling to the Ka'bah for
Hajj is waajib (obligatory). If a person who
undertakes a journey that is waajib or mustahabb
still cannot be like one of the Sahaabah who
travelled to visit the Prophet (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) during his
lifetime, how can they achieve this by
undertaking a journey that is not allowed?"
He also said (p. 133): "All of the ahaadeeth
about visiting his grave are da'eef, and are not
to be relied upon in matters of religion. For
this reason none of the authors of books of
Saheeh and Sunan reported them at
all; they were only narrated by those who
reported da'eef ahaadeeth, such as
al-Daaraqutni, al-Bazzaar and others.
Shaykh al-Albaani said in al-Da'eefah
(no. 1021) about this hadeeth: it is baatil
(false). He mentioned what is wrong with the
hadeeth, namely the man who is not named, and
classed Haaroon Abu Qaz'ah as da'eef. There is a
third fault with the hadeeth, which is that it
causes confusion and contradiction. Then Shaykh
al-Albaani said: "In general, the isnaad of this
hadeeth is weak."
He also said in al-Da'eefah (no. 47):
"many people think that Shaykh al-Islam Ibn
Taymiyah and those who follow him among the
Salafis forbid visiting the grave of the Prophet
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him)
altogether. This is a lie and a fabrication, and
it is not the only lie told about Ibn Taymiyah,
may Allaah have mercy on him, or about the
Salafis. Everyone who reads the books of Ibn
Taymiyah will see that he says it is permissible
to visit his grave (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him), and that doing so is
recommended (mustahabb), so long as it is not
associated with any objectionable practices or
innovations (bid'ah), such as travelling solely
for that purpose, because of the hadeeth "No one
should set out purposely except to visit three
mosques." The hadeeth does not describe a ban
only on travelling to visit other mosques, as
many people think; it also includes a ban on
setting out to visit any place which people
think will bring them closer to Allaah, whether
it is a mosque, a grave or any other place. This
is indicated by the hadeeth narrated by Abu
Hurayrah who said: `I met Basrah ibn Abi Basrah
al-Ghifaari and he asked me, `Where are you
coming from?' I said, `From al-Toor [Sinai].' He
said, `If I had met you before you left, you
would not have gone there! I heard the Messenger
of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon
him) say: `Do not travel except to three
mosques.'" (Reported by Ahmad and others with a
saheeh isnaad).
This clearly indicates that the Sahaabah
understood the hadeeth to be general in
application [i.e., it did not apply only to
mosques]. This is supported by the fact that it
is not reported that any of them ever set out
with the intention of visiting a grave. They are
the predecessors of Ibn Taymiyah in this regard,
so whoever condemns Ibn Taymiyah is in effect
condemning the salaf (the righteous
predecessors), may Allaah be pleased with them.
May Allaah have mercy on the one who said: "All
goodness is in following those who went before
(the salaf)"
and all evil is in following the innovations
of those who came later."
In conclusion, travelling with the intention
of visiting the grave of the Prophet (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) is bid'ah and
is haraam, because of the hadeeth which forbids
travelling to worship in any place except the
three mosques. As for visiting the grave of the
Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon
him) when one happens to be in Madeenah, this is
perfectly acceptable, as is travelling with the
intention of praying in the Prophet's Mosque as
an act of worship and seeking to draw close to
Allaah. Those that are confused about this issue
are those who do not understand the difference
between what is permitted and what is forbidden.
And Allaah knows best.
Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid
(www.islam-qa.com)
32690: What is the status of
the hadeeth, "No man is scratched by a thorn…"?
Question:
What is the status of this hadeeth?
It was narrated that the Prophet (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "No man
is scratched by a thorn, or stumbles, or has a
twitching in a vein, except for a sin, and what
Allaah forgives is greater." Does this mean
that everything that happens to a person is
because of his sin? I read this in Tafseer
al-Qurtubi, and I looked in Saheeh al-Bukhaari
and Fath al-Baari, but I could not find it.
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
Firstly:
This hadeeth was narrated by al-Tabari in
al-Tafseer, 5/175; and by al-Bayhaqi in
Shu'ab al-Eemaan, 7/153; from the mursal
hadeeth of Qataadah.
A mursal report is one which is narrated by a
Taabi'i from the Prophet (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him), with no narrator in
between. This is one of the categories of da'eef
(weak) hadeeth. So this hadeeth has a weak
isnaad, as was mentioned by al-Albaani in
al-Silsilah al-Da'eefah, 1796.
Secondly:
The meaning of the hadeeth is sound and is
supported by other evidence from the Book of
Allaah and the Sunnah of His Messenger (peace
and blessings of Allaah be upon him). The
calamities that befall a man may be as the
result of sin that he has committed, so this
calamity may be expiation for that sin.
Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
"Whatever of good reaches you, is from
Allaah, but whatever of evil befalls you, is
from yourself. And We have sent you (O Muhammad)
as a Messenger to mankind, and Allaah is
Sufficient as a Witness"
[al-Nisa' 4:79]
"And whatever of misfortune befalls you, it
is because of what your hands have earned. And
He pardons much"
[al-Shoora 42:30]
Ibn Katheer said in his Tafseer (1/529):
"Whatever of good reaches you, is from
Allaah" means, it is by the grace, bounty,
kindness and mercy of Allaah. "but whatever
of evil befalls you, is from yourself"
means, it is because of your own actions. This
is like the verse in which Allaah says
(interpretation of the meaning):
"And whatever of misfortune befalls you,
it is because of what your hands have earned.
And He pardons much"
[al-Shoora 42:30]
Al-Saddi, al-Hasan al-Basri, Ibn Jurayj and
Ibn Zayd said: "is from yourself" means,
because of your sin. Qataadah said concerning
this verse, "is from yourself" means, as
a punishment to you, O son of Adam, for your
sin.
Thirdly:
The calamities that befall a believer in this
world raise him in status and expiate for his
sins.
Hence the believer should accept whatever
calamities Allaah decrees for him, and should
realize that this is good for him.
It was narrated that `Aa'ishah (may Allaah be
pleased with her), the wife of the Prophet
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him),
said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "There is
no calamity that befalls a Muslim but Allaah
expiates (sin) thereby, even a thorn that pricks
him." Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 5640; Muslim,
2572.
Muslim (2572) narrated that `Aa'ishah said: I
heard the Messenger of Allaah (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) say: "There is
nothing that befalls a believer, not even a
thorn that pricks him, but Allaah will record a
hasanah (good deed) for him thereby, or erase
from him a sin."
And Allaah knows best.
Islam Q&A (www.islam-qa.com)
21711: al-Namrood and the
people of the ditch
Question:
In which book of Hadees is the Explanation of
Namrood's infanticide during the days of Hazarat
Abrahim ?.
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
Al-Namrood was the king of Babylon, and he
was a kaafir king. There happened between him
and Ibraaheem (peace be upon him) that which
Allaah describes in the verse (interpretation of
the meaning):
"Have you not looked at him who disputed
with Ibraaheem (Abraham) about his Lord
(Allaah), because Allaah had given him the
kingdom? When Ibraaheem (Abraham) said (to him):
`My Lord (Allaah) is He Who gives life and
causes death.' He said, `I give life and cause
death.' Ibraaheem (Abraham) said, `Verily,
Allaah brings the sun from the east; then bring
it you from the west.' So the disbeliever was
utterly defeated. And Allaah guides not the
people, who are Zaalimoon (wrongdoers)"
[al-Baqarah 2:258]
There is no story about him and any child
that can be proven, as far as we know.
But if you are asking about the story of the
believing boy and the kaafir king, and how the
boy was killed and the people believed in
Allaah, and they bore persecution for that, this
is the story of the people of the ditch, which
was narrated by Muslim (3005) from the hadeeth
of Suhayb (may Allaah be pleased with him),
which says that the Messenger of Allaah (peace
and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said:
The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings
of Allaah be upon him) said: "Among those who
came before you there lived a king who had a
(court) sorcerer. As he (the sorcerer) grew old,
he said to the king: `I have grown old, so send
some young boy to me so that I may teach him
magic.' He (the king) sent a boy to him so that
he might train him (in magic). On his way to the
sorcerer he (the boy) met a monk and sat with
him. He (the boy) listened to his (the monk's)
talk and was impressed by it. So whenever he
went to the sorcerer he would pass by the monk
and sit with him. And when he came to the
sorcerer, he (the sorcerer) beat him. He
complained about it to the monk and he said to
him: `When you feel afraid of the sorcerer, say:
My family made me late. And when you feel afraid
of your family, say: The sorcerer made me late.'
It so happened that there came a huge beast (of
prey) and it blocked the way of the people. He
(the young boy) said: I shall find out today
whether the sorcerer or the monk is superior. He
picked up a stone and said: O Allaah, if the
affairs of the monk are dearer to You than the
affairs of the sorcerer, bring death to this
animal so that the people will be able to move
about freely. He threw that stone at it and
killed it and the people were able to pass
freely. He (the boy) then came to that monk and
told him (what had happened). The monk said: My
son, today you are better than me. Your affairs
have reached a stage where I think that you will
be soon put to the test, and in case you are put
to the test do not reveal my identity. That
young man began to heal the blind and those
suffering from leprosy and he began to cure
people of (all kinds) of illness. When a
companion of the king, who had become blind,
heard about him, he came to him with numerous
gifts and said: If you heal me, all these things
here will be yours. He said: I myself do not
heal anyone; it is Allaah Who heals. If you
believe in Allaah, I shall also pray to Allaah
to heal you. He believed in Allaah and Allaah
healed him. He came to the king and sat by his
side as he used to sit before. The king said to
him: Who restored your eyesight? He said: My
Lord. He asked, Do you have any Lord other than
me? He said: My Lord and your Lord is Allaah; so
he (the king) took hold of him and tortured him
until he revealed the identity of the boy. The
boy was then summoned and the king said to him:
O boy, it has been conveyed to me that you have
become so proficient in your magic that you heal
the blind and those suffering from leprosy and
you do such and such things. Thereupon he said:
I do not heal anyone; it is Allah Who heals. He
(the king) took hold of him and began to torture
him. So he revealed the identity of the monk.
The monk was thus summoned and it was said to
him: Turn back from your religion. But he
refused to do so. He (ordered) a saw to be
brought and he (the king) placed it in the
middle of his head and cut it until it fell
apart. Then the courtier of the king was brought
and it was said to him: Turn back from your
religion, but he refused to do so. So the saw
was placed in the middle of his head and it was
cut until it fell apart. Then the boy was
brought and it was said to him: Turn back from
your religion. He refused to do so and he was
handed over to a group of his courtiers. He said
to them: Take him to such and such a mountain;
make him climb that mountain and when you reach
its top (ask him to renounce his faith) but if
he refuses to do so, then throw him (down the
mountain). So they took him and made him climb
the mountain and he said: O Allaah, save me from
them however You will. The mountain began to
shake and they all fell down, and the boy came
walking back to the king. The king said to him:
What has happened to your companions? He said:
Allaah has saved me from them. He again handed
him to some of his courtiers and said: Take him
and carry him away in a small boat and when you
reach the middle of the ocean (ask him to
renounce) his religion, but if he does not
renounce his religion throw him (into the
water). So they took him and he said: O Allaah,
save me from them and what they want to do. It
was not long before the boat overturned and they
were drowned but he came walking back to the
king. The king said to him: What has happened to
your companions? He said: Allaah has saved me
from them. He also said to the king: You cannot
kill me until you do what I ask you to do. And
he said: What is that? He said: You should
gather people in a plain and crucify me on the
trunk (of a tree). Then take an arrow from my
quiver and say: In the name of Allaah, the Lord
of the boy; then shoot an arrow and if you do
that then you would be able to kill me. So he
(the king) called the people to an open plain
and crucified him (the boy) on the trunk of a
tree. Then he took an arrow from his quiver,
placed the arrow in the bow and then said: In
the name of Allaah, the Lord of the boy; he then
shot an arrow and it hit his temple. He (the
boy) placed his hands upon the temple where the
arrow had hit him and he died. The people said:
We believe in the Lord of this boy, we believe
in the Lord of this boy, we believe in the Lord
of this boy. Some people came to the king and
said to him: Do you realize that you what feared
has happened? All the people now believe (in the
Lord of the boy). He (the king) commanded
ditches to be dug at the entry-points of the
roads. When these ditches were dug, and fires
was lit in them it was said (to the people): He
who does not turn back from his (the boy's)
religion will be thrown in the fire or they will
be told to jump in it. So they started to do
that until a woman came with her child and she
hesitated to jump into the fire. Then her child
said to her: O mother, be patient, for you are
following the Truth."
Your saying in your question "Hazrat
Ibraaheem" is an innovated expression which is
best avoided, because for the Prophets (peace be
upon them) there is an expression which is used
only for them, namely "al-salaatu wa'l-salaamu
`alayhim (blessings and peace be upon them).
There is scholarly consensus on this point, as
was narrated by Ibn al-Qayyim in Jala'
al-Afhaam from Imam al-Nawawi (may Allaah
have mercy on them both)
And Allaah knows best. Islam Q&A
(www.islam-qa.com)
43147: Reconciling the
ahaadeeth about how many times better praying in
congregation is than praying alone
Question:
In Saheeh al-Bukhaari there are two ahaadeeth
_ numbers 645 and 646 according to the numbering
of Fath al-Baari. According to hadeeth no. 645
the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him) said: "Praying in
congregation is twenty seven times better than
praying alone". According to hadeeth no. 646,
the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him) said: "Praying in
congregation is twenty-five times better than
praying alone." I hope that you can comment and
explain.
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
The first hadeeth was narrated from
`Abd-Allaah ibn `Umar by al-Bukhaari (619) and
Muslim (650). It says: "Praying in congregation
is twenty seven times better than praying
alone".
The second hadeeth was narrated from Abu
Sa'eed al-Khudri, and was narrated by
al-Bukhaari (619). It says: "Praying in
congregation is twenty-five times better than
praying alone."
The scholars have reconciled between these
two hadeeth. Al-Nawawi (may Allaah have mercy on
him) said:
They may be reconciled in three ways:
1 _ There is no contradiction because
mentioning a smaller number does not rule out
the larger number. Taking numbers literally is
not acceptable according to the scholars of
usool.
2 _ He first spoke of the smaller number then
Allaah told him of the greater bounty so he
spoke of that.
3 _ It may vary according to the
circumstances of the worshippers and the prayer.
So for some of them it may be twenty-five and
for some it may be twenty-seven, depending on
how complete their prayer is, whether it is done
in the proper manner and with proper focus and
humility (khushoo'), the number of people
present, how good they are, how good the
environment is, etc. And Allaah knows best.
Al-Majmoo', 4/84
And there are other ways of reconciling the
two hadeeth, some of which are based on the
above. Al-Haafiz Ibn Hajar suggested another way
in Fath al-Baari (2/132) which was not
mentioned by al-Nawawi, which is twenty-seven
applies to the prayers in which Qur'aan is
recited out loud and twenty-five applies to the
prayers in which it is recited silently.
And Allaah knows best. Islam Q&A
(www.islam-qa.com)
22836: The ratio of people of
Paradise to people of Hell
Question:
In Saheeh al-Bukhaari there are two ahaadeeth
(nos. 6529 and 6530 according to the numbering
of Fath al-Baari). In hadeeth no. 6529 it says
that the number of "those who are to be sent to
Hell is ninety nine from every hundred." And in
hadeeth no. 6530 it says that the number of
"those who are to be sent to Hell is nine
hundred and ninety nine from every thousand." I
hope that you could comment and explain this.
May Allaah reward you with good.
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
The first hadeeth was narrated by al-Bukhaari
(6529) from Abu Hurayrah, that the Prophet
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him)
said: "The first one to be called on the Day of
Resurrection will be Adam. He will be shown his
progeny and it will be said, `This is your
father Adam.' He will say, `Here I am at Your
service.' He will say: `Bring forth those who
are to be sent to Hell from among your progeny.'
He will say, `O Lord, how many should I bring
forth?' He will say, `Bring forth from every
hundred ninety nine.'" They said: "O Messenger
of Allaah, if ninety nine are taken from every
hundred of us, what will be left of us?" He
said, "My ummah, among the other nations, is
like a white hair on a black bull."
The second hadeeth was narrated by
al-Bukhaari (3348) and Muslim (222) from Abu
Sa'eed al-Khudri (may Allaah be pleased with
him), that the Prophet (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him) said: "Allaah will say, `O
Adam!' and he will say, `Here I am at Your
service, and all goodness is in Your hand.' He
will say, `Bring forth those who are to be sent
to Hell.' He will say, `Who are those who are to
be sent to Hell?' He will say, `From every
thousand, nine hundred and ninety nine.' At that
point the young will turn grey, every pregnant
female will abort, and the people will appear
intoxicated although they are not. But the
punishment of Allaah is severe." They said, "O
Messenger of Allaah, which of us will be that
one?" He said, "Be of good cheer, for there will
be one man from among you and one thousand from
among Ya'jooj and Ma'jooj." Then he said, "By
the One in Whose hand is my soul, I hope that
you will be one quarter of the people of
Paradise," and they said, "Allaahu akbar!" Then
he said, "I hope that you will be one third of
the people of Paradise," and they said, "Allaahu
akbar!" Then he said, "I hope that you will be
half of the people of Paradise," and they said,
"Allaahu akbar!" Then he said, "Among the people
you are like a black hair on the hide of a white
bull, or like a white hair on the hide of a
black bull."
According to the first hadeeth, the number of
those who will be saved on the Day of
Resurrection is ten in a thousand. According to
the second hadeeth it is one in a thousand.
The scholars have reconciled between these
two ahaadeeth in several ways, such as the
following:
1 _ The numbers are not to be taken
literally, so stating a particular number does
not mean that there may not be more than that.
What is meant by the two numbers mentioned in
the two hadeeth is the small number of believers
and the large number of kaafirs.
2 _ The hadeeth of Abu Sa'eed al-Khudri may
be understood as referring to all the progeny of
Adam, so there will be one in every thousand
(who goes to Paradise), and the hadeeth of Abu
Hurayrah may be understood as referring to
everyone except Ya'jooj and Ma'jooj, so that the
number is ten in every thousand. This is
supported by the fact that Ya'jooj and Ma'jooj
are mentioned in the hadeeth of Abu Sa'eed but
not in the hadeeth of Abu Hurayrah.
3 _ It may be that the division will happen
twice: once involving all the nations who came
before this ummah, when the number will be one
in every thousand, and again for this ummah
only, when the number will be ten in every
thousand.
4 _ It may be that what is meant by "those
who are to be sent to Hell" is the kaafirs and
the sinners [from among the Muslims] who will
enter it, so that from every thousand nine
hundred and ninety nine kaafirs are sent, and
from every hundred ninety-nine sinners are sent.
These answers were mentioned by al-Haafiz Ibn
Hajar in Fath al-Baari, 11/390.
And Allaah knows best.
Islam Q&A (www.islam-qa.com)
20612: He is amazed by the
height of Adam (peace be upon him)
Question:
In saheeh al bukhari hadith No246, rasulullah
states Adam was created 30m in height. i cannot
understand and imagine this can you please
expain?.
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
Firstly:
This hadeeth was narrated by Abu Hurayrah
(may Allaah be pleased with him) from the
Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon
him) who said:
"Allaah created Adam and he was sixty cubits
tall. Then He said, `Go and greet those angels
and listen to how they greet you, for that will
be your greeting and the greeting of your
progeny.' He said, `Al-salaamu `alaykum (Peace
be upon you).' They said, `Al-salaamu `alaykum
wa rahmat-Allaah (Peace be upon you and the
mercy of Allaah).' So they added the words `wa
rahmat Allaah.' And everyone who enters Paradise
will be in the form of Adam. People kept on
growing smaller until now."
Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 3336; Muslim, 7092
According to a version narrated by Muslim:
"Everyone who enters Paradise will be in the
form of Adam who was sixty cubits tall. People
kept growing smaller until now."
With regard to the words of the Prophet
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him),
"People kept growing smaller until now,"
al-Haafiz ibn Hajar said in Fath al-Baari
(6/367): "This means that in every generation
people grew shorter than the previous
generation, and continued to grow shorter until
the time of this ummah, then they stayed like
that."
The Muslim is obliged to believe in every
idea for which there is evidence in the Qur'aan
or saheeh Sunnah from the Messenger of Allaah
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him).
Imam al-Shaafa'i (may Allaah have mercy on him)
said: "I believe in Allaah and in that which
came from Allaah in the sense meant by Allaah. I
believe in the Messenger of Allaah and in what
came from the Messenger of Allaah in the sense
meant by the Messenger of Allaah." See
al-Irshaad Sharh Lam'at al-I'tiqaad, p.
89.
So the believer is required to believe with
firm faith in everything that we are told by
Allaah and by the Prophet (peace and blessings
of Allaah be upon him), if it is proven to be
soundly reported from him (peace and blessings
of Allaah be upon him). He must believe in it
with firm faith that leaves no room for the
slightest doubt. He must accept it in general
and specific terms, whether he understands it or
not and whether he finds it strange or not,
because not understanding something that is
proven in a sound report does not mean that it
did not happen. All that means is that he cannot
comprehend this particular issue. Allaah has
commanded us to believe in everything that He
tells us and everything that His Prophet (peace
and blessings of Allaah be upon him) tells us.
Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
"Only those are the believers who have
believed in Allaah and His Messenger, and
afterward doubt not but strive with their wealth
and their lives for the Cause of Allaah. Those!
They are the truthful"
[al-Hujuraat 49:15]
Part of faith is belief in the unseen
(al-ghayb). The hadeeth we are discussing
here comes under this heading. Allaah praises
those who believe in the unseen, as He says
(interpretation of the meaning):
"Alif-Laam-Meem. [These letters are one of
the miracles of the Qur'aan and none but Allaah
(Alone) knows their meanings.]
This is the Book (the Qur'aan), whereof there
is no doubt, a guidance to those who are
Al-Muttaqoon [the pious believers of Islamic
Monotheism who fear Allaah much (abstain from
all kinds of sins and evil deeds which He has
forbidden) and love Allaah much (perform all
kinds of good deeds which He has ordained)].
Who believe in the Ghayb[the unseen]"
[al-Baqarah 2:1-3]
You should note that Allaah is Able to do all
things. Just as He is able to create man in the
form that he appears in now, He is also Able to
create man in a larger or smaller form.
If this is difficult for you to understand,
then think of the dwarves that we see, who are
child-sized men. If this can happen, then why
could the opposite not happen, namely a man
being sixty cubits tall? In the history of
mankind there have been giants as the
archaeologists tell us.
The basic principle here is to accept the
absolute power of Allaah and to accept what He
tells us and what His Messenger (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) tell us, and to
say what those who are well versed in knowledge
say:
"We believe in it; the whole of it (clear
and unclear Verses) are from our Lord"
[Aal `Imraan 3:7 _ interpretation of the
meaning].
We ask Allaah to show us the truth as true
and help us to follow it, and to show us
falsehood as false and help us to avoid it.
And Allaah knows best. Islam Q&A
(www.islam-qa.com)
34750: Woman taking off her
clothes in a house other than her husband's
house
Question:
It is proven in the hadeeth that a woman is
forbidden to take off her clothes anywhere other
than her husband's house. What is the purpose of
that prohibition? Is she allowed to take off her
clothes in the house of her own family or her
relatives?.
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
The hadeeth which was narrated by Imam Ahmad,
Ibn Maajah and al-Haakim from `Aa'ishah (may
Allaah be pleased with her) says: "Any woman who
takes off her clothes anywhere but in her
husband's house has torn the veil that was
between her and Allaah (i.e., He will expose
her)."
A version that was narrated by Ahmad,
al-Tabaraani, al-Haakim and al-Bayhaqi from Abu
Umaamah (may Allaah be pleased with him) says:
"Any woman who takes off her clothes, Allaah
will tear His cover away from her (i.e., expose
her)."
What the Prophet (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him) meant was to stop women
treating as insignificant the matter of removing
their clothes anywhere but in their husband's
houses in such a manner that their `awrah can be
seen and that they may be accused of intending
to commit immoral actions and the like. As for
taking off their clothes in a safe place, such
as in her family's house or her mahram's house,
to change her clothes and the like, or to relax
etc and for other permissible purposes that are
far removed from fitnah, there is nothing wrong
with that.
And Allaah is the Source of strength.
Al-Lajnah al-Daa'imah li'l-Buhooth
al-`Ilmiyyah wa'l-Ifta', 17/224.
(www.islam-qa.com)
9262: What is the ability to
marry that is mentioned in the hadeeth which
encourages marrying?
Question:
What is meant by the words man astataa'
al-baa'ah (whoever is able to) in the hadeeth in
which the Messenger of Allaah (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) encourages
young men to get married?.
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
It was narrated that Ibn Mas'ood said: The
Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon
him) said: "O young men, whoever among you is
able to, let him get married. Whoever is not
able to, he must fast, for it will be a shield
for him." Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 5065; Muslim,
1400
A shield means protection against committing
immoral actions.
The scholars differed concerning the meaning
of ability here, and there are two opinions.
Some of them said that it means the ability to
afford the expenses of marriage and spending on
one's wife; others said that it means the
ability to have intercourse. There is no
conflict between the two meanings, so what it
meant is that whoever is able to have
intercourse and can afford it, let him get
married.
Al-Nawawi said:
The scholars differed concerning the meaning
of ability here, and there are two views which
boil down to the same meaning. The sounder of
these two views is that what is meant is what
the word (al-baa'ah) means in Arabic,
which is the ability to have intercourse. So the
meaning is, whoever is able to have intercourse
because he can afford the expenses of marriage,
then let him get married. Whoever is unable to
have intercourse because he cannot afford the
expenses of marriage, then he has to fast in
order to control his desire.
Sharh Muslim, 9/173
Ibn al-Qayyim said:
With regard to the phrase, "whoever among you
is able to, let him get married" _ the word
al-baa'ah was interpreted as meaning
intercourse, and as meaning the expenses of
marriage. That does not contradict the first
meaning. Rawdat al-Muhibbeen, p. 219
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said:
The ability to get married is the ability to
afford the expenses of marriage, not the ability
to have intercourse because the hadeeth is
addressed to those who are able to have
intercourse. Hence those who cannot afford it
are commanded to fast, for it is a shield.
Al-Fataawa al-Kubra, 3/134. Islam Q&A
(www.islam-qa.com)
12403: Advice to one who
wants to get married but is not able for it
Question:
In the mosque we had a program where the
Muslim youth could discuss with those who are
older the ahaadeeth of the Messenger (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) concerning
marriage, and the fact that they should make it
easy for the youth to get married. This subject
led to a number of discussions, because the
parents are concerned about the situation and
welfare of the couple, especially if they have
children.
Young people nowadays do not complete their
university studies until the age of 21, or 23
for those who study medicine. They cannot afford
the expenses of marriage. So what practical
advice can you give them? Many of the Muslim
youth in the west want to complete half of their
religion.
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
Firstly:
Discussing Islamic matters and spending time
on that is one of the most beneficial things
that a person can do for himself, because
seeking knowledge is an obligation and an act of
worship, and he is spending time in doing
something that is of benefit to him and to
others. If the people who are discussing do not
understand something, then they have to ask
people who have knowledge.
Secondly:
Our advice to those who live in the lands of
immorality and kufr is to migrate from them to
the Muslim lands where the temptations of this
world and of women are less. The Muslim
countries are not equal in that regard, so he
has to choose the best of them.
We advise them to leave every environment in
which he may stumble and fall, whether that is
his accommodation, his work or his
school/college.
We advise them to hasten to marry, and to
choose righteous wives who do not make
extravagant demands with regard to the mahr,
etc.
We advise those who are unable to get married
to fear Allaah and not to look at or listen to
haraam things, not to walk towards haraam
things, not to touch that which it is not
permissible for him to touch. They should help
themselves in this regard by fasting and
praying, making du'aa', and keeping company with
righteous people. They should keep themselves
busy with beneficial things such as seeking
knowledge, memorizing Qur'aan and making du'aa'
to Allaah, for if a person keeps busy in obeying
Allaah, that will distract him from disobeying
Him.
Thirdly:
Our advise to community leaders and parents
and guardians of boys and girls is not to regard
completion of studies as an impediment to
marriage. Since when is marriage an obstacle to
acquiring knowledge?! Rather reality and
experience point to the opposite, because
marriage helps a person to focus and makes his
mind clear, and above all that it is obedience
to the command of the Messenger (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) to the youth to
get married.
So parents and guardians should not burden
the youth with excessive demands that may be
regarded as a form of extravagance. They should
limit the demands to that which the woman and
the house need only. They should understand that
marriage is one of the means by which provision
is sought. Allaah says (interpretation of the
meaning):
"And marry those among you who are single
(i.e. a man who has no wife and the woman who
has no husband) and (also marry) the Saalihoon
(pious, fit and capable ones) of your (male)
slaves and maidservants (female slaves). If they
be poor, Allaah will enrich them out of His
Bounty. And Allaah is AllSufficient for His
creatures' needs, AllKnowing (about the state of
the people)"
[al-Noor 24:32]
And Allaah knows best.
Islam Q&A (www.islam-qa.com)
20653: The soundness and
meaning of the hadeeth about performing Hajj
every five years
Question:
We would like to know how to understand the
hadeeth found in Saheeh At-Targheeb wat-Tarheeb
(Al-Albani-RA)which states that (hadeeth qudsi)
one whom Allaah has granted good health etc..
and does not visit His house every five years is
mahroom (deprived). Does it refer to Hajj or
`umrah or both? And whatever the case may be,
what are we to take from the hadeeth?.
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
Firstly:
The text of the hadeeth:
It was narrated from Abu Sa'eed al-Khudri
that the Messenger of Allaah (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "Allaah
says: `A person whose body I make healthy and to
whom I grant ample provision but five years go
by and he does not come to Me is indeed
deprived.'"
Narrated by Abu Ya'laa, 2/304; al-Bayhaqi,
5/262
Secondly:
Discussion of the hadeeth:
Some of the scholars have discussed this
hadeeth. Some of them _ such as Ibn al-`Arabi
al-Maaliki _ were of the view that it is mawdoo'
(fabricated). Others classed it as da'eef, such
as al-Daaraqutni, al-`Aqeeli and al-Subki. Ibn
Hibbaan and Shaykh al-Albaani in al-Silsilah
al-Saheehah (1662) are of the view that it
is saheeh.
Thirdly:
Some of the scholars have interpreted this
hadeeth as referring to Hajj or `Umrah. Based on
this, al-Haythami included this hadeeth in his
book Mawaarid al-Zam'aan under the
heading "Chapter concerning one who is well off
but does not go for Hajj or `Umrah in five
years."
Mawaarid al-Zam'aan, p. 239.
Others interpreted it as referring to Hajj
only, as al-Mundhiri included it in his book
al-Targheeb wa'l-Tarheeb under the
heading, "Warning to one who is able to do Hajj
but does not go for Hajj."
Some of the scholars quoted this hadeeth as
evidence that it is obligatory to perform Hajj
once every five years for the one who is able to
do that. This is a weak view, either because the
hadeeth is weak (da'eef) and not saheeh, or
because the hadeeth is to be understood as
referring to what is mustahabb, not what is
obligatory.
Al-Subki said:
The scholars are agreed that Hajj is an
individual obligation upon every accountable,
free Muslim who is able to do it, once in his or
her lifetime, except for very few scholars who
held different views, who said: It is obligatory
once every five years, and they based that view
on the report that the Prophet (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "Every
Muslim should come to the House of Allaah every
five years." This was narrated by Ibn al-`Arabi.
We say: Narrating this hadeeth is haraam, so how
can a ruling be established based on it?
Al-Daaraqutni said: It was narrated through
more than one isnaad, none of which are saheeh
at all. Fataawa al-Subki, 1/263
Al-Hattaab said:
Some of those who held an odd view said that
it is obligatory every year, and it was narrated
from some of them that it is obligatory every
five years, because of the report according to
which the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah
be upon him) said: "Every Muslim should come to
the House of Allaah every five years." Ibn
`Arabi said: Narrating this hadeeth is haraam,
so how can a ruling be established based on it?
Meaning that it is mawdoo' (fabricated).
Al-Nawawi said: This idea is contrary to the
consensus of the scholars, so this odd view is
to be rejected on the basis of the consensus of
the scholars who came before those who held this
odd view.
Even if we accept this hadeeth, then it is to
be understood as meaning that it is mustahabb.
Mawaahib al-Jaleel, 2/466. And Allaah
knows best. Islam Q&A (www.islam-qa.com)
14627: Meaning of maa'ilaat
mumeelaat
Question:
What is the meaning of the words of the
Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon
him) in the hadeeth, "maa'ilaat mumeelaat"?.
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
This is a saheeh hadeeth which was narrated
by Muslim in his Saheeh from the Prophet
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) who
said: "There are two types of the people of Hell
whom I have not seen: men in whose hands are
whips like the tails of cattle, with which they
beat the people, and women who are clothed yet
naked, maa'ilaat mumeelaat, with their
heads like the humps of camels, tilted to one
side. They will not enter Paradise nor even
smell its fragrance." This is a stern warning to
beware of the things referred to.
The men in whose hands are whips like the
tails of cattle are those who beat the people
unjustly, like police and others, whether that
is done by order of the state or otherwise. The
state is only to be obeyed with regard to
matters that are right and proper. The Prophet
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him)
said: "Obedience is only with regard to what is
right and proper." And he (peace and blessings
of Allaah be upon him) said: "There is no
obedience to any created being if it involves
disobedience towards the Creator."
With regard to the phrase "women who are
clothed yet naked, maa'ilaat mumeelaat",
the scholars interpreted this as follows:
"kaasiyat `aariyaat (translated above
as "clothed yet naked" may have another meaning,
which is that they are enjoying the blessings of
Allaah, but they do not give thanks for them and
they do not obey the commands of Allaah or heed
His prohibitions, even though Allaah has
bestowed upon them wealth and other blessings.
The hadeeth is also explained in a different
manner, which is that they wear clothes that do
not cover them, because they are too thin or too
short, so they do not serve the purpose of
clothes, hence they are described as naked, and
because the clothes they wear do not cover their
`awrah.
Maa'ilaat (literally "deviant") means
they turn away from chastity and righteousness,
i.e., they commit sins and evil deeds like those
who do immoral actions, or they fall short in
doing the obligatory duties, prayer etc.
Mumeelaat means they turn others away,
i.e., they call people to evil and corruption,
so by their words and actions they lead others
into immorality and sin, and they commit immoral
actions because of their lack of faith or the
weakness of their faith. The point of this
saheeh hadeeth is to warn against oppression and
all kinds of corruption from men and women.
With regard to the phrase, "their heads are
like the heads of camels, tilted to one side,"
some of the scholars said that this means they
make their heads look big because of the
hairstyles they adopt and so on, so that it
looks like the hump of a bakht camel. The bakht
is a type of camel that has two humps between
which there is a dip, so that one hump leans one
way and the other leans the other way. When
these woman make their heads look big in this
way, they look like these humps.
With regard to the phrase, "They will not
enter Paradise nor even smell its fragrance,"
this is a stern warning; it does not necessarily
mean that they are kaafirs or that they will
abide in Hell forever, like other sinners who
die as Muslims; rather what is meant is that
they and other sinners are threatened with Hell
for their sins, but they are subject to the will
of Allaah. If He wills He will forgive them and
if He will He will punish them. This is like the
verse in which Allaah says (interpretation of
the meaning):
"Verily, Allaah forgives not that partners
should be set up with Him (in worship), but He
forgives except that (anything else) to whom He
wills" [al-Nisa' 4:48]
If a sinner (who is Muslim) enters Hell, he
will not abide therein forever like the kuffaar,
and those who will abide therein like murderers,
adulterers and suicides will not abide therein
forever like the kuffaar; rather it is an
eternity which will have an end according to Ahl
al-Sunnah wa'l-Jamaa'ah _ in contrast to the
Khawaarij and Mu'tazilah and the innovators who
follow their path, because the saheeh mutawaatir
ahaadeeth narrated from the Messenger of Allaah
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him)
indicate that he will intercede for the sinners
among his ummah and that Allaah will accept that
intercession from him (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him) a number of times; each time
He will specify a number who are to be brought
forth from Hell. Similarly the rest of the
Messengers, the believers and the angels will
all intercede by Allaah's leave, and He will
accept their intercession for whomsoever He will
among the believers in Tawheed who have entered
Hell because of their sins but are Muslims. Then
there will remain in Hell those sinners who are
not included in the intercession of the
intercessors, but Allaah will bring them forth
by His Mercy and Kindness, and there will be
none left in Hell but the kuffaar who will abide
therein forever and ever. Allaah says concerning
the kuffaar (interpretation of the meaning):
"whenever it abates, We shall increase for
them the fierceness of the Fire"
[al-Isra' 17:97]
"So taste you (the results of your evil
actions). No increase shall We give you, except
in torment" [al-Naba' 78:30]
And He says concerning the kuffaar who
worshipped idols (interpretation of the
meaning):
"Thus Allaah will show them their deeds as
regrets for them. And they will never get out of
the Fire" [al-Baqarah 2:167]
And Allaah says (interpretation of the
meaning):
"Verily, those who disbelieve, if they had
all that is in the earth, and as much again
therewith to ransom themselves thereby from the
torment on the Day of Resurrection, it would
never be accepted of them, and theirs would be a
painful torment.
They will long to get out of the Fire, but
never will they get out therefrom; and theirs
will be a lasting torment" [al-Maa'idah
5:36-37]
We ask Allaah to keep us safe and sound from
being like them.
Majmoo' Fataawa wa Maqaalaat Mutanawwi'ah
li'l-Shaykh Ibn Baaz, 6/355 (www.islam-qa.com)
6652: What does it mean when
we say that Allaah loves beauty?
Question:
What is the meaning of the hadeeth which says
that Allaah is beautiful and loves beauty? What
is meant here by beauty? _ especially since some
people use this hadeeth as evidence that it is
permissible to look at beautiful women and to
enjoy every beautiful thing. Can you clarify
this?
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
The hadeeth mentioned in the question was
narrated by Muslim in his Saheeh, no.
131, from `Abd-Allaah ibn Mas'ood, who narrated
that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah
be upon him) said: "No one will enter Paradise
who has an atom's-weight of pride in his heart."
A man said, "What if a man likes his clothes to
look good and his shoes to look good?" He said,
"Allaah is beautiful and loves beauty. Pride
means denying the truth and looking down on
people."
Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allaah have mercy on him)
said, commenting on this hadeeth: the phrase
"Allaah is beautiful and loves beauty" includes
the beautiful clothing which was asked about in
the same hadeeth. It is included by way of
generalization, i.e., that beauty in all things
is what is meant here. In Saheeh Muslim
no. 1686 it says: "Allaah is good and only
accepts that which is good." In Sunan
al-Tirmidhi it says: "Allaah loves to see
the effects of His blessing on His slave."
(Narrated by al-Tirmidhi, no. 2963; he said it
is hasan saheeh). It was reported that
Abu'l-Ahwas al-Jashami said: The Prophet (peace
and blessings of Allaah be upon him) saw me
wearing old, tattered clothes, and asked me, "Do
you have any wealth?" I said, "Yes." He said,
"What kind of wealth?" I said, "All that Allaah
has given me of camels and sheep." He said,
"Then show the generous blessings that He has
given you." (Narrated by Ahmad, no. 15323;
al-Tirmidhi, 1929; al-Nisaa'i, 5128). Allaah,
may He be glorified, loves the effects of His
blessings to His slave to be made manifest, for
this is part of the beauty that He loves, and
that is part of the gratitude for His blessings
which forms an inner beauty (beauty of
character). Allaah loves to see the external
beauty of His slaves which reflects His
blessings on them, and the inner beauty of their
gratitude to Him for those blessings. Because He
loves beauty, He sends down on His slaves
clothes and adornments with which they may make
their outward appearance beautiful and He gives
them Taqwaa which makes their inner characters
beautiful. Allaah says (interpretation of the
meaning):
"O Children of Adam! We have bestowed raiment
upon you to cover yourselves (screen your
private parts, etc.) and as an adornment, and
the raiment of righteousness, that is better."
[al-A'raaf 7:26]
And He says, speaking of the people of
Paradise (interpretation of the meaning):
"… and [Allaah] gave them Nadratan (a
light of beauty) and joy. And their recompense
shall be Paradise and silken garments, because
they were patient." [al-Insaan 76:11-12]
Their faces will be made beautiful with the
Nadrah (light of beauty), their innermost
being with joy and their bodies with silken
garments.
Just as Allaah loves beauty in words, deeds,
garments and outward appearance, so He hates
ugliness in words, deeds, garments and outward
appearance. He hates ugliness and its people,
and loves beauty and its people. But two groups
are misguided with regard to this issue: a group
who say that everything that He has created is
beautiful, so He loves all that He has created
and we should love all that He has created and
not hate anything. They say: whoever realizes
that all that exists comes from Him will see
that it is beautiful… these people have no sense
of jealousy for the sake of Allaah or hatred and
enmity for the sake of Allaah, or denouncing
what is evil (munkar), or jihaad for the sake of
Allaah, or adhering His limits. They regard the
beauty of images, male or female, as being part
of the beauty that Allaah loves, and seek to
worship Allaah through immoral acts. Some of
them may even go so far as to claim that the One
Whom they worship is manifested or incarnated in
those images.
The second group, on the other hand, say that
Allaah condemns the beauty of images, forms and
outward appearances. Allaah says about the
Munaafiqoon (hypocrites) (interpretation of the
meaning):
"And when you look at them, their bodies
please you…" [al-Munaafiqoon 63:4]
"And how many a generation have We
destroyed before them. Who were better in
wealth, goods and outward appearance?" [Maryam
19:54]
In Saheeh Muslim it is reported that
the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be
upon him) said: "Allaah does not look at your
outward appearance and your wealth, rather He
looks at your hearts and deeds." (Saheeh
Muslim, no. 4651).
According to another hadeeth: "Shabbiness is
part of faith." (Narrated by Ibn Maajah, 4108;
Abu Dawood, 3630; classed as saheeh by
al-Albaani, may Allaah have mercy on him).
Allaah condemns those who are extravagant, which
applies to extravagance in clothing as well as
in food and drink.
In order to settle this dispute, we may say
that beauty in clothing and outward appearance
is of three types, one of which is commendable,
one is blameworthy and one of which is neither.
The kind of beauty which is to be commended is
that which is done for the sake of Allaah, to
help one to obey Allaah and fulfil His commands,
such as when the Prophet (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him) made himself look beautiful
(i.e. handsome) when meeting the delegations
that came to him. This is like wearing armour or
battle-dress when fighting, or wearing silk and
showing off (in front of the enemy). This is
commendable because it is done to make the word
of Allaah supreme and to support His religion
and annoy His enemies. The blameworthy kind of
beauty is that which is done for the sake of
this world, for reasons of power, false pride
and showing off, or to fulfil some (selfish)
desires. This also includes cases where beauty
is an end in itself for a person and is all he
cares about. Many people have no other concern
in life. As for the kind of beauty which is
neither commendable nor blameworthy, it is that
which has nothing to do with either of the two
purposes mentioned above (i.e., it is neither
for the sake of Allaah nor for the sake of
worldly purposes).
The hadeeth under discussion refers to two
important principles, knowledge and behaviour.
Allaah is to be acknowledged for beauty that
bears no resemblance to anything else, and He is
to be worshipped by means of the beauty which He
loves in words, deeds and attitudes. He loves
His slaves to beautify their tongues with the
truth, to beautify their hearts with sincere
devotion (Ikhlaas), love, repentance and
trust in Him, to beautify their faculties with
obedience, and to beautify their bodies by
showing His blessings upon them in their
clothing and by keeping them pure and free of
any filth, dirt or impurity, by removing the
hairs which should be removed, by circumcision,
and by clipping the nails. Thus they recognize
Allaah through these qualities of beauty and
seek to draw close to Him through beautiful
words, deeds and attitudes. They acknowledge Him
for the beauty which is His attribute and they
worship Him through the beauty which He has
prescribed and His religion. The hadeeth
combines these two principles of knowledge and
behaviour.
Al-Fawaa'id, 1/185
Where are these deep meanings of this
hadeeth, as explained by Ibn al-Qayyim, in the
misguided interpretations of those who follow
their whims and desires, who want to follow
deviant interpretations in order to justify
their evil aims and goals? We ask Allaah to
protect us. May Allaah bless our Prophet
Muhammad.
Islam Q&A
Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid
(www.islam-qa.com)
13260: Meaning of good
treatment in the hadeeth "… and treats them
well…"
Question:
What is the meaning of good treatment in the
hadeeth of the Messenger (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him): "Whoever has two daughters
and he treats them well, they will be a shield
for him against the Fire"?
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
Good treatment of girls and others means
giving them an Islamic upbringing, teaching them
the truth, striving to keep them chaste and keep
them away from the things that Allaah has
forbidden, such as tabarruj (wanton display)
etc. The same applies to taking care of one's
sisters and sons, so that all of them will be
brought up to obey Allaah and His Messenger, and
will keep away from the things that Allaah has
forbidden, and will do their duty towards
Allaah. Hence we know that good treatment does
not simply mean giving them food and drink and
clothing only; rather what is meant is something
greater than that, treating them kindly by
taking care of both their religious and worldly
interests.
Fataawa al-Shaykh Ibn Baaz in al-Fataawa
al-Jaami'ah li'l-Mar'ah al-Muslimah, part 3, p.
1074 (www.islam-qa.com)
10299: Names of Commentaries
on Saheeh Muslim
Question:
I want to know the names of some detailed
commentaries on Saheeh Muslim.
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
You may read the book Fath al-Mulhim li
Sharh Saheeh Muslim by Imam al-Subki;
al-Siraaj al-Wahhaaj by Abu'l-Tayyib
Siddeeq ibn Hasan Khan al-Qanooji al-Bukhaari,
b. 1248 AH, d. 1307 AH, which is comprised of 13
volumes.
And Allaah is the Source of strength.
Islam Q&A. Sheikh Muhammed Salih
Al-Munajjid (www.islam-qa.com)
14397: What is the meaning
of the words "I am his hearing with which he
hears…" etc?
Question:
What is the meaning of Allaah's words in the
hadeeth qudsi, "When I love him I am his hearing
with which he hears, his seeing with which he
sees, his hand with which he strikes and his
foot with which he walks"?
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
If the Muslim does the obligatory acts that
Allaah has enjoined upon him, then he strives to
draw closer to Allaah by doing naafil
(supererogatory) acts of worship and persists in
that as much as he can, then Allaah will love
him and will help him in all that he does or
does not do. So when he hears he will be guided
by Allaah with regard to what he hears, and he
will not hear anything but what is good, and he
will not accept anything but the truth, and
falsehood will be kept away from him, by the
help and support of Allaah. So he will see the
truth as truth and falsehood as falsehood, and
when he strikes anything he will strike with
power from Allaah, so his strike will be like a
strike from Allaah in support of the truth. And
when he walks he will be walking in obedience to
Allaah, seeking knowledge, striving in jihad for
the sake of Allaah. To sum up, all that he does,
both inwardly and outwardly, will be guided and
supported by Allaah.
Hence it becomes clear that there is nothing
in this hadeeth to indicate that Allaah is
"incarnated" in His creation or that He becomes
one with any of them. This is shown by the words
at the end of the hadeeth, where Allaah says:
"Were he to ask [something] of Me, I would
surely give it to him, and were he to ask Me for
refuge, I would surely grant him it." According
to some reports, He also said, "So by My help he
hears and by My help he sees…" This explains
what is meant at the beginning of the hadeeth,
and it clearly demonstrates that there is one
who asks and One Who is asks, one who seeks
refuge and One Who grants refuge [i.e., two
separate entities]. This hadeeth is similar to
another hadeeth qudsi: "Allaah says: `O My
slave, I fell sick and you did not visit Me…'"
In both cases, the latter part of the hadeeth
explains the first part, but those who are led
by their whims and desires follow the ambiguous
texts and ignore the clear and unambiguous
texts, and so they go astray.
Al-Lajnah al-Daa'imah, Kitaab Fataawa
Islamiyyah, 1/35. (www.islam-qa.com)
13731: The meaning of the
hadeeth, "Whoever taunts his brother with a sin"
and how sound it is
Question:
Hadhrat Muaaz (Allah be pleased with him)
narrates that Muhammad (peace be upon him) said:
"Whoever taunts a brother (Muslim) with a sin
(which the Muslim has committed), will not die
until he the taunter) commits the same sin."
Could you please xplain this Hadith in further
detail?
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
This hadeeth was narrated by al-Tirmidhi,
(Kitaab Sifat al-Qiyaamah wa'l-Wara',
2429), where the wording is, "Whoever shames his
brother for a sin will not die until he does it
too."
Shaykh al-Albaani described this hadeeth in
Da'eef al-Jaami' (5710) as mawdoo'
(fabricated).
If a hadeeth is da'eef (weak) and mawdoo'
(fabricated), it cannot be taken as a basis for
rulings or be acted upon.
With regard to the meaning of the hadeeth,
Shaykh al-Mubaarakfoori said:
" `Whoever shames' means whoever criticizes
or condemns. `his brother' means his brother in
faith. `For a sin' means one from which he has
repented, according to the way in which Imaam
Ahmad explained it. `will not die' _ the subject
of this verb is `whoever'. `Until he does it
too' means, the sin for which he criticizes his
brother. It is as if the one who criticizes his
brother will be forsaken by Allaah until he
commits the sin for which he criticized his
brother, if that criticism was accompanied by
self-admiration for being free of that sin."
(Tuhfat al-Ahwadhi, 7/173)
The fact that this hadeeth is da'eef (weak)
does not mean that it is permissible to
criticize those who have fallen into sin, for
those who fall into sin are of different types.
Some of them repent and turn back to their
Lord, or else the punishment (hadd) is carried
out on them. So it is not permissible to
criticize them because their souls have been
purified by their repentance or the punishment.
The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be
upon him) said: "The one who repents from sin is
like one who has never sinned." (Narrated by Ibn
Maajah, 4240; classed as saheeh by al-Busayri in
al-Zawaa'id, commentary on Sunan Ibn
Maajah).
Imam Ahmad said that the punishment mentioned
in the hadeeth is for the one who criticizes a
person who has repented from his sin, as
al-Tirmidhi narrated from him. After narrating
this hadeeth, he said: Ahmad said: from a sin
from which he has repented.
Some of them commit sin but they do not do it
openly. Anyone who comes to know of that has to
advise the person and cover his faults.
And some of them commit sin openly. They
should also be advised, and others should be
warned against them to whatever extent is
appropriate.
Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allaah have mercy on him)
said:
It may be that what he meant is that your
criticizing your brother for his sin is an even
greater sin than his, because it means that you
feel pride in your obedience and you are
praising yourself for that, and claiming to be
free from sin, whereas your brother has fallen
into sin. But it may be that his feeling humble
because of his sin and what has happened to him,
such as his feeling humble and submissive,
thinking less of himself, ridding himself of
pious pretensions, arrogance and
self-admiration, standing before Allaah with his
head bowed, his gaze lowered and his heart
broken _ it may be that all of that is better
for him than your feeling proud of your
obedience, thinking that you are doing much
good, believing that by doing so you are
important, and reminding Allaah and mankind of
that.
How close this sinner is to the mercy of
Allaah, and how close this conceited one is to
the wrath of Allaah! A sin that leads to
humility is more beloved to Him than an act of
obedience which fills a person with conceit. If
you sleep all night then wake up feeling regret
(for not having prayed qiyaam al-layl), that may
be better for you than if you were to pray all
night and wake up in the morning filled with
self-admiration. For the deeds of the one who
admires himself are not accepted. Perhaps your
laughing whilst admitting to shortcomings is
better than your weeping with piety but being
filled with conceit. The groaning of the sinners
is more beloved to Allaah than the tasbeeh of
the conceited. It may be that by means of this
sin, Allaah has caused him to drink the medicine
that will cure a fatal disease which you also
have, but you do not realize it. Allaah has
reason for what He does to both those who are
obedient and those who sin, which are known to
no-one except Him, and which no one recognizes
except those who have insight, and then only
within the limits of human understanding; beyond
that there are reasons which are not even known
to the honourable scribes (i.e., the recording
angels). The Prophet said: "If the slave woman
of any one of you commits adultery, let him
carry out the punishment on her and not
criticize." And Yoosuf (peace be upon him) said:
"No reproach on you this day" [Yoosuf 12:92 _
interpretation of the meaning]. For the
scale is in the hand of Allaah, and the ruling
is His. The point is to carry out the punishment
(prescribed by Allaah) and not to shame and
criticize. No one feels safe from what has been
decreed for them and from the power of His
decree except those who are ignorant of Allaah.
Allaah said to the one who had more knowledge of
Him than anyone else and was closer to Him:
"And had We not made you stand firm, you
would nearly have inclined to them a
little"[al-Israa' 17:74 _ interpretation of the
meaning]. And Yoosuf said: "Unless You
turn away their plot from me, I will feel
inclined towards them and be one (of those who
commit sin and deserve blame or those who do
deeds) of the ignorant"[Yoosuf 12:33 _
interpretation of the meaning]. One of the
ways in which the Messenger of Allaah used to
swear was "No, by the One who turns hearts." And
he said, "There is no heart which is not between
two of the fingers of the Most Merciful. If He
wills He guides it aright and if He wills He
sends it astray." Then he said, "O Allaah, the
one Who turns hearts over, make our hearts
steadfast in adhering to Your religion. O
Allaah, musrif al-Quloob, sirf our hearts to
obey You."
Madaarij al-Saalikeen, 1/177, 178)
And Allaah knows best.
Islam Q&A
Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid
(www.islam-qa.com)
2665: Meaning of the
hadeeth, "Treat women kindly"
Question:
The hadeeth says, "Treat women kindly, for
woman was created from a bent rib, and the most
crooked part of the rib is the top part…" Please
explain the meaning of this hadeeth, especially
the phrase "and the most crooked part of the rib
is the top part".
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
This is a saheeh hadeeth which was narrated
by the two Shaykhs [al-Bukhaari and Muslim] in
al-Saheehayn from the Prophet (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him), from the
hadeeth of Abu Hurayrah (may Allaah be pleased
with him). The Prophet (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him) said: "Treat women kindly,
for woman was created from a bent rib, and the
most crooked part of the rib is the top part, so
treat women kindly."
This is a command to husbands, fathers,
brothers and others to treat women kindly and
not to oppress them; to give them their rights
and to guide them to do good. This is what is
obligatory upon everyone, because the Prophet
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him)
said: "Treat women kindly." This is not altered
by the fact that a woman may sometimes mistreat
her husband or relatives with her words or
actions, because she was created from a rib as
the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be
upon him) said, and the most crooked part of it
is the top. It is well known that the top of it
is the part by which it is attached, so the rib
will have some crookedness in it at that point,
as is well known.
The meaning is that she will inevitably have
some crookedness or shortcomings in her
character. Hence it was narrated in another
hadeeth in al-Saheehayn:
"I have not seen any lacking in rational
ability and failing in religion but (at the same
time) robbing the wisdom of the wise, besides
you [women]."
The point is that this is the ruling of the
Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon
him), and it is narrated in al-Saheehayn from
the hadeeth of Abu Sa'eed al-Khudri (may Allaah
be pleased with him). What is meant by lacking
in rational ability, as the Prophet (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) said, is that
the testimony of two women is equivalent to the
testimony of one man. Failing in religion, as
the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be
upon him) said, means that women spend days and
nights without praying, i.e., because of
menstruation or post-childbirth bleeding. This
is a shortcoming which Allaah has decreed for
them, and there is no sin on them because of
that.
So women should accept this in the way that
the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be
upon him) meant it, even if a woman is
knowledgeable and pious, because the Prophet
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) did
not speak of his own whims and desires, rather
that was a Revelation that was revealed to him,
which he conveyed to the ummah, as Allaah says
(interpretation of the meaning):
"By the star when it goes down (or vanishes).
Your companion (Muhammad) has neither gone
astray nor has erred.
Nor does he speak of (his own) desire.
It is only a Revelation revealed" [al-Najm
53:1-4]
Majmoo' Fataawa wa Maqaalaat al-Shaykh `Abd
al-`Azeez ibn Baaz (may Allaah have mercy on
him), part 5 (www.islam-qa.com)
22394: The soundness of the
hadeeth "Do not write anything from me…" and
explanation of what it means
Question:
Is this hadeeth saheeh, and what does it
mean: "Do not write anything from me, and
whoever writes anything but the Qur'aan, let him
erase it"? May Allaah reward you with good.
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
It was narrated from Abu Sa'eed al-Khudri
that the Messenger of Allaah (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "Do not
write anything from me; whoever has written
anything from me other than the Qur'aan, let him
erase it and narrate from me, for there is
nothing wrong with that." (Narrated by Muslim,
al-Zuhd wa'l-Raqaa'iq, 5326)
Al-Nawawi said in his commentary on Saheeh
Muslim:
"Al-Qaadi said: there were many disputes
among the Sahaabah and Taabi'een concerning the
writing down of knowledge. Many of them regarded
this as being makrooh, but most of them regarded
it as permissible. This dispute is no longer an
issue.
They differed as to the meaning of this
hadeeth which says that it is forbidden. It was
said that this pertained to one who was sure of
his memory, and there was the fear that he may
rely upon what he had written if he wrote it
down; the ahaadeeth which say that it is
permissible to write things down is to be
interpreted as referring to the one whose memory
is not reliable, such as the hadeeth, "Write it
down for Abu Shaah"; or the hadeeth of the
saheefah of `Ali (may Allaah be pleased with
him); the hadeeth of the book of `Amr ibn Hazm,
which contains laws on inheritance, sunnahs and
diyaat (blood money); the hadeeth about writing
down charity, and the minimum amounts at which
zakaah becomes obligatory (nisaab), with which
Abu Bakr sent Anas (may Allaah be pleased with
him) to Bahrain; the hadeeth of Abu Hurayrah
which says that Ibn `Amr ibn al-`Aas used to ;
write things down but he (Abu Hurayrah) did not
write things down, and other ahaadeeth. And it
was said that the hadeeth forbidding writing
down ahaadeeth was abrogated by these ahaadeeth.
The prohibition was in effect when there was the
fear that (the words of the Prophet (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) might be mixed
with the Qur'aan. When that danger was no longer
present, permission was given to write down
(ahaadeeth). And it was said that the
prohibition mentioned in the hadeeth referred to
writing ahaadeeth on the same page as Qur'aan,
lest they become mixed and thus the reader would
be confused when looking at this page. And
Allaah knows best.
The hadeeth of Abu Shaah was narrated by
al-Bukhaari from Abu Hurayrah (may Allaah be
pleased with him), who said: `When Allaah
granted His Prophet (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him) victory over Makkah, he
stood before the people and praised and
glorified Allaah, then he said: "Allaah
protected Makkah from the elephant and has given
authority to His Messenger and the believers
over it, so fighting was forbidden for anyone
before me, and was made permissible for me for
part of a day, and it will not be permissible
for anyone after me. Its game should not be
chased, its thorny bushes should not be
uprooted, and picking up its fallen things is
not allowed except for one who makes public
announcement for it, and he whose relative is
murdered has the option either to accept a
compensation for it or to retaliate." Al-`Abbas
said, "Except Al-Idhkhir (a kind of plant), for
we use it in our graves and houses." The
Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him) said, "Except Al-Idhkhir."
Abu Shaah, a Yemeni, stood up and said, "O
Messenger of Allaah! Get it written for me." The
Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him) said, "Write it for Abu
Shaah." (al-Luqatah, 2254)
Ibn Hajar said: What may be understood from
the story of Abu Shaah ("Write it for Abu
Shaah") is that the Prophet (peace and blessings
of Allaah be upon him) gave permission for
hadeeth to be written down from him.
This contradicts the hadeeth of Abu Sa'eed
al-Khudri, which says that the Messenger of
Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon
him) said, `Do not write down anything from me
except the Qur'aan.' (Narrated by Muslim).
The two may be reconciled by noting that the
prohibition applied only to the time when the
Qur'aan was being revealed, lest it be confused
with something else, and that permission was
given at other times; or that the prohibition
applied only to writing down things other than
Qur'aan with the Qur'aan on one thing, and that
permission was given to write them separately;
of that the prohibition came first and the
permission abrogated that, when there was no
longer any fear of confusion. This is most
likely to be the case.
It was said that the prohibition applied only
to those whom it was feared would depend on the
writing and not memorize things, and that
permission was given for those from whom such a
thing was not feared.
The scholars said: a group of the Sahaabah
and Taabi'een regarded it as makrooh to write
down the hadeeth and they regarded it as
mustahabb to learn it from them by heart, as
they had learned it. But when people were no
longer able to strive so hard (in memorizing)
and the scholars feared that knowledge might be
lost, they compiled it in books."
Islam Q&A. Sheikh Muhammed Salih
Al-Munajjid (www.islam-qa.com)
13930: Meaning of the
hadeeth "No haamah and no Safar and no naw' and
no ghoul"
Question:
I read a strange hadeeth which says that
there is no haamah, no Safar, no naw' and no
ghoul. What do these words mean?
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
Ibn Muflih al-Hanbali said:
In al-Musnad, al-Saheehayn and
elsewhere it is narrated that the Prophet (peace
and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "No
haamah and no Safar." Muslim and others add the
words, "No naw' and no ghoul."
Haamah (pl. Haam) [owl]: the people of the
jaahiliyyah used to think that when someone died
and was buried, an owl [haamah] would come out
of his grave. The Arabs used to think that the
bones of the deceased turned into owls which
flew, and they said that if someone was
murdered, an owl would come out of his head, and
it would keep saying, "Give me to drink, give me
to drink," until the slain person was avenged
and his killer was killed.
Safar: it was said that they used to have
superstitions concerning the month of Safar, so
the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be
upon him) said: "No Safar". And it was said that
the Arabs used to believe that there was a snake
in the stomach which would harm a person when he
had intercourse, and that this was contagious,
so the Lawgiver denied that. Maalik said: the
people of the Jaahiliyyah would regard Safar as
not being sacred one year and as sacred the next
year.
Naw': (pl. al-Anwaa') (a star which sets at
the rising of another): this refers to twenty
eight lunar mansions or phases, as in the aayah
(interpretation of the meaning):
"And the moon, We have measured for it
mansions…" [Yaa-Seen 36:39].
Every thirteen nights, one of these stars
sets in the west at dawn, and another rises in
the east, so that at the end of the year they
will all have come and gone. The Arabs used to
believe that when one set and the next one rose,
there would be rain, which they attributed to
them (these stars), so they would say, "We have
rain because of such and such naw' (star which
sets at the rising of another)."
It is called naw' because when the star which
is setting sets in the west, the one which is
rising appears (naa'a) in the east, i.e., it
rises and emerges. And it was said that naw'
means setting, which is the opposite.
But in the case of those who believe that
rain came by the will of Allaah and say, "We
have rain at the time of such and such naw'"
meaning that Allaah usually causes rain to come
at this time _ there is some dispute as to
whether saying this is haraam or makrooh.
Ghoul (pl. gheelaan) means a kind of jinn or
devil. The Arabs used to think that the ghoul
lived in the wilderness and would appear to
people, and that it could take on different
shapes and colours, and that it would make them
lose their way, seeking to kill them. The
Lawgiver rejected and denied this idea
altogether.
And it was said that this was not denying
that ghouls exist, rather it was a denial of the
Arabs' belief that they could change shape and
colour and make people lose their way, hence the
meaning of "no ghoul" is that they cannot make
people lose their way. This is borne out by
another hadeeth, "There is no ghoul but there is
sa'aali" This is in Muslim and elsewhere.
Sa'aali is a magician among the jinn, but among
them there are magicians who base their magic on
confusion and illusions… al-Khallaal narrated
from Taawoos that a man accompanied him, then a
crow cawed and the man said, "Good, good."
Taawoos said to him, "What good is there in
this, and what evil? Do not come with me!"
(al-Aadaab al-Shar'iyyah, 3/369, 370)
Ibn al-Qayyim said:
Some scholars said that the words "no healthy
person should be exposed to a sick person" were
abrogated by the words "There is no `adwa
(contagion)." This is not correct. This is an
example where what is negated is different than
what is affirmed. What the Prophet (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) denied when he
said "There is no contagion and no Safar" was
the belief of the mushrikeen which was
based on their beliefs of shirk. With
regard to the Prophet's prohibition of exposing
healthy people to sick people, there are two
interpretations:
(1) The fear that people may attribute what
Allaah has decreed to `adwa (contagion),
which may confuse those who hear of this and
make them believe in `adwa. There is no
contradiction between the two reports.
(2) That this refers to exposing the sick
person to the healthy person, which may be the
means by which Allaah creates disease, so the
exposure is the cause, but Allaah may divert its
effects by means of other causes which oppose it
or prevent the effect of the sickness. This is
pure Tawheed, unlike that which the people of
shirk believe in.
This is similar to the denial of intercession
on the Day of Resurrection mentioned in the
aayah (interpretation of the meaning):
"when there will be no bargaining, nor
friendship, nor intercession"
[al-Baqarah 2:254]
This does not contradict the unambiguous
mutawaatir ahaadeeth which say that there will
be intercession on the Day of Resurrection,
because what Allaah is denying here is the kind
of intercession that was known among the
mushrikeen, where an intercessor would
come forward and intercede without being given
permission. The intercession which is affirmed
by Allaah and His Messenger is that which comes
after His permission is given, as in the aayahs
(interpretation of the meaning):
"…Who is he that can intercede with Him
except with His Permission?…"
[al-Baraqah 2:255]
"and they cannot intercede except for him
with whom He is pleased"
[al-Anbiyaa' 21:28]
"Intercession with Him profits not except for
him whom He permits"
[Saba' 34:23]
Haashiyat Tahdheeb Sunan Abi Dawood,
10/289-291)
And Allaah is the One Who grants strength to
do what is right.
Islam Q&A
Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid
(www.islam-qa.com)
12817: except ruqam (marks
or stripes) on clothes
Question:
What is meant by ruqam (marks or stripes on
clothes) in the hadeeth "except ruqam on
textiles"?
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
The scholars (may Allaah have mercy on them)
interpreted ruqam in two ways:
(i) That it refers to images in carpets and
similar items, which are walked on and are not
treated in a respectful manner like pillows.
This is allowed, because the Messenger (peace
and blessings of Allaah be upon him) allowed it.
What is meant is that he allowed their use, but
making images is not allowed.
(ii) That it refers to decorations on
garments, apart from pictures or images.
Decoration on clothing is fine and does not come
under the ruling on images. What is forbidden is
images of animate beings, human or otherwise,
because it was reported that the Prophet (peace
and blessings of Allaah be upon him) entered
upon `Aa'ishah and saw a garment on which there
was an image. He got angry and tore it down, and
said, "The makers of these images will be
punished on the Day of Resurrection, and they
will be told, `Give life to that which you have
created.' `Aa'ishah said: So I made it into two
pillows on which the Prophet (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) could recline.
Al-Nasaa'i narrated with a saheeh isnaad from
Abu Hurayrah (may Allaah be pleased with him)
that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah
be upon him) had an appointment with Jibreel,
and he was late, so he went out to him and found
him waiting for him (outside). Jibreel said to
him: "In the house there is a statue, and a
curtain with images on it, and a dog. Go and
break the head off the statue so that it will
look like a tree, and go and make two pillows
out of the curtain that will be thrown on the
floor and stepped on, and go and throw the dog
out." The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah
be upon him) went and did that, then Jibreel
(peace be upon him) came in. Abu Hurayrah said:
the dog was a puppy underneath a bed in the
house, which has been brought in by al-Hasan and
al-Husayn.
Majmoo' Fataawa al-Maqaalaat Mutunaaw'iah li
Samaahat al-Shaykh al-`Allaamah `Abd al-`Azeez
ibn Baaz (may Allaah have mercy on him), p. 91
(www.islam-qa.com)
4713: What is the meaning of the hadeeth
"We are an unlettered nation, we do not write or
calculate"?
Question:
What is the meaning of the hadeeth "We are an
unlettered nation, we do not read or write"?
Does this contradict what the Muslims are doing
nowadays of seeking education?
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
The wording of the hadeeth is not as
mentioned in the question. We will quote it
here:
It was narrated from Ibn `Umar (may Allaah be
pleased with him) that the Prophet (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "We are
an unlettered nation, we do not write or
calculate. The month is such-and-such or
such-and-such _ meaning sometimes it is
twenty-nine and sometimes it is thirty."
(Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 1814; Muslim, 1080)
This hadeeth was narrated concerning the
issue of the beginning of the lunar month, and
it indicates that there is no need to resort to
astronomical calculations in order to know when
the month begins. We should rely on visual
sighting of the moon when it is new, then we
will know that the month has begun. The hadeeth
was quoted to explain that we should rely on
sighting of the moon and not on calculations. It
did not come to urge the ummah to remain
ignorant and not to learn arithmetic and all
other useful sciences. So this hadeeth does not
contradict what Muslims are doing nowadays of
seeking education in different branches of
science which will benefit their worldly
interests. Islam is the religion of knowledge;
it calls for knowledge and obliges every Muslim
to learn what Allaah has enjoined upon him and
to learn whatever rulings of sharee'ah he needs
to know about acts of worship and dealings with
others. With regard to worldly sciences such as
medicine, engineering, agriculture, etc.,
Muslims have to learn whatever the ummah needs
to know. If the Muslims need to manufacture a
needle, there has to be someone among them who
can learn how to make this needle.
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah wrote a very
useful discussion on this hadeeth; there follows
a selection of his comments on it:
"The phrase `We are an unlettered nation' is
not telling them to be like that. They were
unlettered before Islam came, as Allaah says
(interpretation of the meaning):
`He it is Who sent among the unlettered
ones a Messenger (Muhammad) from among
themselves'
[al-Jumu'ah 62:2]
`And say to those who were given the
Scripture (Jews and Christians) and to those who
are illiterates (Arab pagans): Do you (also)
submit yourselves (to Allaah in Islam)?'
[Aal `Imraan 3:20]
Although this is how they were before the
Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon
him) was sent to them, they were not commanded
to become like that. Some of the implications of
being unlettered were to remain, but as we shall
see, they were not commanded to remain as they
were in every sense…
Among the nation to which Allaah sent him
were some who could read and write a great deal,
just as there were among his Companions. There
were also some who could calculate. The Prophet
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was
sent with some obligations which involve
calculation. It was narrated that when the
person he had appointed to take care of the
zakaah, Ibn al-Latabiyyah, came to him, he
calculated the total amount collected. He had a
number of scribes, such as Abu Bakr, `Umar,
`Uthmaan, `Ali, Zayd and Mu'aawiyah, who would
write down the Revelation, and would write
contracts and write his letters to the people to
whom Allaah had sent him, the kings of the earth
and the leaders of groups, and to his workers,
governors, etc. Allaah says in His Book
(interpretation of the meaning):
"… that you might know the number of the
years and the reckoning"
[Yoonus 10:5; al-Israa' 17:12]
This is mentioned in two places in the
Qur'aan, where Allaah tells us that He has
created [the sun and moon] so that the
calculations may be known.
The word ummi (unlettered or
illiterate) comes from the same root as the word
ummah (nation). It refers to one who is
not distinguished from the rest of the people by
knowing how to read or write. It is akin to the
word `aammi which is used to describe a
regular person (one of the `aammah or
masses) who is not distinguished from them by
having knowledge which they do not have. It was
also said that the word ummi is connected
to the word umm (mother), because he has
learned no more than his mother taught him, and
so on.
The distinction which takes him out of the
ranks of the regular, unlettered people into the
ranks of those who have specialized knowledge
may be a virtue in and of itself, as in the case
of those who read Qur'aan and understand its
meaning, or it may be a means which helps to
reach that level of virtue, as when a person is
distinguished from them by his being able to
write and read. So the one who uses that
knowledge to pursue perfection is to be praised,
whilst the one who neglects it or uses it for
evil purposes is to be condemned. Whoever does
away with it in favour of something that is more
beneficial is more perfect, and if you can
achieve the aim without using these means, then
that is even better.
Thus it is clear that being distinct from the
unlettered is of two types. The first nation to
which the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah
be upon him) was sent was the Arabs, through
whom the Message was conveyed to all the other
nations, because it was sent in their tongue.
They were mostly illiterate, and they had no
advantage of having knowledge or a scripture
etc., although by nature they were more ready to
learn than other nations. They were like a
plowed field that is ready to be sown, but there
was no one to do the task and they had no
scripture they could read that had been revealed
from Allaah, as the People of the Book had, or
any analytical science like the Sabaeans and
others had. Writing existed among them, but to a
very small extent. They had some knowledge of
the type that is acquired by common sense, but
which does not make an individual distinct from
any other unlettered person; for example, they
knew of the Creator, and they held good
characteristics in high esteem, and they had
some knowledge of astronomy, genealogy and
poetry. So they deserved to be called unlettered
in all senses of the word, as Allaah said
concerning them (interpretation of the meaning):
"`He it is Who sent among the unlettered
ones a Messenger (Muhammad) from among
themselves'
[al-Jumu'ah 62:2]
`And say to those who were given the
Scripture (Jews and Christians) and to those who
are illiterates (Arab pagans): Do you (also)
submit yourselves (to Allaah in Islam)?'
[Aal `Imraan 3:20]
So the unlettered or illiterate were
described as being opposite to the People of the
Book, for the kitaabi (one of the People
of the Book) is something other than the
ummi (unlettered).
When he was sent among them, it became
obligatory upon them to follow the Book that he
brought and to ponder its meanings, understand
it and act upon it. Allaah made this Book an
explanation for all things, and their Prophet
taught them everything, even (the etiquette of)
defecation. They became people of a Book and
people of knowledge, indeed, they became the
most knowledgeable of people and the best of
them in beneficial knowledge. They lost the
feature of blameworthy and imperfect illiteracy,
which is the lack of knowledge and a revealed
Book, and they gained knowledge of the Book and
wisdom. They inherited the Book, as Allaah said
concerning them (interpretation of the meaning):
"He it is Who sent among the unlettered
ones a Messenger (Muhammad) from among
themselves, reciting to them His Verses,
purifying them (from the filth of disbelief and
polytheism), and teaching them the Book (this
Qur'aan, Islamic laws and Islamic jurisprudence)
and AlHikmah (AsSunnah: legal ways, orders, acts
of worship of Prophet Muhammad). And verily,
they had been before in manifest error"
[al-Jumu'ah 62:2]
They were unlettered in every sense of the
word, but when he taught then the Book and
al-Hikmah, Allaah said concerning them
(interpretation of the meaning):
"Then We gave the Book (the Qur'aan) as
inheritance to such of Our slaves whom We chose
(the followers of Muhammad). Then of them are
some who wrong their ownselves, and of them are
some who follow a middle course, and of them are
some who are, by Allaah's Leave, foremost in
good deeds"
[Faatir 35:32]
"And this is a blessed Book (the Qur'aan)
which We have sent down, so follow it and fear
Allaah (i.e. do not disobey His Orders), that
you may receive mercy (i.e. saved from the
torment of Hell).
Lest you (pagan Arabs) should say: `The Book
was sent down only to two sects before us (the
Jews and the Christians), and for our part, we
were in fact unaware of what they studied.'
Or lest you (pagan Arabs) should say: `If
only the Book had been sent down to us, we would
surely, have been better guided than they (Jews
and Christians).'"
[al-An'aam 6:155-157]
And Allaah answered the prayer of al-Khaleel
(Ibraaheem) for them, when he said
(interpretation of the meaning):
"Our Lord! Send amongst them a Messenger
of their own (and indeed Allaah answered their
invocation by sending Muhammad), who shall
recite unto them Your Verses and instruct them
in the Book (this Qur'aan) and Al-Hikmah (full
knowledge of the Islamic laws and jurisprudence
or wisdom or Prophethood)
[al-Baqarah 2:129]
So there are kinds of illiteracy which are
haraam, kinds which are makrooh and kinds which
are a shortcoming and failure to do that which
is better. A person who does not know how to
read al-Faatihah or any part of the
Qur'aan, is called by the fuqahaa' in their
discussion on al-salaah (prayer), ummi
(unlettered), the opposite of whom is a
qaari' (one who reads or recites). They
say: it is not correct for a qaari' to be
led in prayer by an ummi, but it is
permissible for an ummi to lead another
ummi in prayer; and they discuss other
issues of the same nature. What they mean by
ummi here is one who cannot read what is
necessary, regardless of whether he can write
and calculate or not.
This illiteracy also includes neglecting what
is obligatory, for which a man will be punished
if he is able to learn it but he does not do so.
There is also the kind of illiteracy which is
blameworthy, such as that which Allaah described
in the case of the People of the Book, when He
said (interpretation of the meaning):
"And there are among them (Jews)
unlettered people, who know not the Book, but
they trust upon false desires and they but
guess"
[al-Baqarah 2:78]
This is a description of one who does not
understand the word of Allaah or act upon it;
all he does is to recite it. Al-Hasan al-Basri
said: The Qur'aan was revealed to be acted upon,
so recitation implies acting upon it. The
ummi in this sense may read the letters
of the Qur'aan, etc., but he does not understand
it; when he speaks about matters of knowledge,
he speaks superficially, based on conjecture.
This person is also regarded as ummi and
deserves to be blamed, just as Allaah condemned
him for his lack of obligatory knowledge,
whether this knowledge is fard `ayn
(obligatory on each individual) or fard
kafaayah (obligatory on the community as a
whole but not on each individual)
There is also the kind of `illiteracy' which
is better and more perfect, such as the one who
only reads a part of the Qur'aan and he only
understands what he has learned. He only
understands as much of sharee'ah as he has to
know. Such a person is also called ummi
(illiterate), and others who learn and act upon
the Qur'aan are better and more perfect than
him.
These matters which distinguish a person are
virtues, and if a person fails to attain them,
he is missing out on something that is
obligatory either on him as an individual
(fard `ayn) or is obligatory on the
community (fard kafaayah) or is
mustahabb (recommended). These attributes
of perfection and virtue may be attributed to
Allaah and His Prophets in general terms. Allaah
is All-Knowing and All-Wise, and He combines
knowledge and beneficial speech in all that He
wants, tells and wills. The same is true of His
Prophets and our Prophet, the leader of the
knowledgeable and wise.
With regard to the distinguishing features
which are means to attaining virtues, but which
one can do without and use alternative means,
these are things like writing and numeracy. If a
person does not have these abilities, knowing
that virtue cannot be achieved without them, not
having them is a sign of imperfection. If a
person acquires them and uses them to perfect
himself _ like the one who learns how to read
and then uses that to read the Qur'aan and read
useful books or write other things that will be
of benefit to people _ then this is a virtue in
his case. But if he uses it for purposes that
will harm him or other people _ like the one who
reads misguided books or writes things that will
harm people, like forging the writing of rulers,
judges and witnesses _ then this will be bad for
him, and will be a sin and imperfection. Hence
`Umar forbade teaching women how to write. If it
is possible to do without it yet still achieve
perfect knowledge, then this is better, and this
was the case with our Prophet (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him), of whom Allaah
said (interpretation of the meaning):
"Those who follow the Messenger, the
Prophet who can neither read nor write (i.e.
Muhammad) whom they find written with them in
the Tawraat (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel)…"
[al-A'raaf 7:157]
His being unlettered did not mean that he was
lacking in knowledge or the ability to recite by
heart, for he is the leader of all imaams in
that regard. What it meant was that he was not
able to write or to read anything that was
written, as Allaah said of him (interpretation
of the meaning):
"Neither did you (O Muhammad) read any
book before it (this Qur'aan), nor did you write
any book (whatsoever) with your right hand…"
[al-`Ankaboot 29:48]
[Then he (Ibn Taymiyah _ may Allaah have
mercy on him) went back to discussing the
hadeeth "We are an unlettered nation, we do not
write or calculate…" and stated that there is a
corroborating report which refers to what is
meant by this hadeeth. Then he said:]
When this is compared with his comment that
the month may be thirty or twenty-nine days, it
becomes clear that what is meant is that with
regard to the new moon (beginning of the month),
we have no need for writing or calculations,
because sometimes it is (thirty days) and
sometimes it is (twenty-nine days). What
differentiates between them is the sighting (of
the new moon), there is nothing else that
differentiates between them, such as writing or
calculation.
Thus is becomes clear that the "illiteracy"
mentioned here is a characteristic which is
praiseworthy in several senses:
it means doing without writing and
calculations in favour of something whichis
clearer and more apparent, namely, (sighting)
the new moon.
- Writing and calculation may involve errors…
Etc.
(Majmoo' al-Fataawa, 25/164-175)
(www.islam-qa.com)
9571: What is the meaning of
the hadeeth "Do not inveigh against time (waqt)
for Allaah is time waqt)"?
Question:
Is the saying "Do not curse time for Allah is
time" authentic from the Rasool's sayings ? If
so, how do you interpret this ? I am confused
about this issue.
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah. The word used in the
hadeeth is not waqt (= time), but dahr (= time,
vicissitudes of time) [this element of confusion
may stem from translation of the question into
Arabic]. This hadeeth was narrated by Muslim
(5827) from Abu Hurayrah.
Other versions of the hadeeth are:
"Do not inveigh against time (al-dahr), for
Allaah is time"
"Let not any one of you say, `Woe to time,'
for Allaah is time"
"Allaah says, `The sons of Adam offend Me and
say, Woe to time, but they should not say Woe to
time. I am time, I alternate the night and the
day, and if I willed, I could seize them both.'"
With regard to the meaning of the hadeeth,
al-Nawawi said:
They said: this is a metaphor, because the
Arabs used to inveigh against time when
disasters such as death, old age, loss of money,
etc., happened. They would say, `Woe to time'
and other phrases cursing or inveighing against
time. So the Prophet (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him) said: `Do not inveigh
against time for Allaah is time', i.e., do not
inveigh against the One Who brings about those
disasters, for that will be directed towards
Allaah, for He is the One Who causes them to
happen. Time (al-dahr) means al-zamaan (time)
which cannot do anything in and of itself, for
it is just one of the things that have been
created by Allaah.
The meaning of the phrase "for Allaah is
time" means that He is the One Who causes those
events and accidents to happen, and He is the
Creator of all that happens. And Allaah knows
best.
(Sharh Muslim, 15/3)
It should be noted that "time" (al-dahr) is
not one of the Names of Allaah; it is attributed
to Allaah in the sense that He created it and is
controlling it, i.e., He is the Creator of time.
Some phrases in the same hadeeth also indicate
this, as when He says, "It is in My Hand, I
alternate the night and the day." The One Who
alternates and the thing which is alternated
cannot be one and the same; there is the One Who
alternates _ i.e., Allaah _ and the thing which
is alternated _ i.e., time, which Allaah
controls as and when He wills.
See: Fataawa al-`Aqeedah by Shaykh Ibn
`Uthaymeen, 1/163
Al-Haafiz Ibn Katheer said, in his Tafseer of
the aayah (interpretation of the meaning):
"And they say: "There is nothing but our
life of this world, we die and we live and
nothing destroys us except AdDahr (time)"
[al-Jaathiyah 45:24]
Al-Shaafa'i, Abu `Ubaydah and others said, in
their commentary on the hadeeth of the Prophet
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), "Do
not inveigh against time for Allaah is time" _
During the Jaahiliyyah, if some difficulty,
trial or disaster befell them, the Arabs would
say `Woe to time', attributing those events to
time and inveighing against it. But the One Who
brought those events to pass is Allaah, so it
was as if they were inveighing against Allaah,
may He be glorified, because in fact He was the
One Who caused those things to happen. So it was
forbidden to inveigh against time in this
manner, because Allaah is Time, i.e., He is the
One lWho is controlling it, but the Arabs were
attributing those events to Time.
This is the best of the comments made in the
Tafseer of this hadeeth, and this is what is
meant. And Allaah knows best.
(Tafseer Ibn Katheer, 4/152)
Shaykh Ibn `Uthaymeen (may Allaah preserve
him) was asked about the ruling on inveighing
against time. He replied:
Inveighing against time may be divided into
three categories:
1. Where the intention is to convey
information without blaming or condemning. This
is permissible, such as when a person remarks,
"We are suffering from the heat (or the cold)
today" and the like, because deeds are judged
according to their intentions, and in this case
a person is merely describing what is happening
without expressing discontent.
2. Where a person inveighs against time as
the cause of events, as if by inveighing against
it he means that time is what causes things to
alternate between good and bad. This is shirk
akbar (major form of shirk) because
when a person attributes events to something
other than Allaah, this means that he believes
that there is another creator alongside Allaah.
3. Where a person inveighs against time but
believes that the One who causes things to
happen is Allaah, but he inveighs against time
because of the bad things that happened. This is
haraam because it is contrary to the sabr
(patience) that is required, but it is not kufr
because the person does not inveigh directly
against Allaah. If he were to inveigh directly
against Allaah, he would be a kaafir.
(Fataawaa al-`Aqeedah, 1/197)
Other reprehensible expressions which people
utter include cursing the hour or the day on
which a certain bad thing happened, and so on.
This is a sin because it is cursing and improper
speech, and because this is cursing something
which does not deserve to be cursed. What has
the hour or the day done wrong? Nothing apart
from the fact that the events happened then, but
they are only created things which have no
control over anything and cannot be held to
blame. If a person inveighs against time, this
reflects on the Creator of time. The Muslim
should be above speaking in such a foolish and
improper manner. And Allaah is the One Whose
help we seek.
Islam Q&A
Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid
(www.islam-qa.com)
4236: The Hadith of the
Seven is Not in Reference to Men Only
Question:
Is the hadith that talks about the seven whom
Allah will shade on the Day in which there is no
shade except Allah's specific just for men
or is it for anyone, such as women, who perform
those acts and, therefore, they will receive
that reward mentioned in the hadith?
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
The merits mentioned in the hadith are not
specifically for men. In fact, they are general
for both men and women. If a young woman grows
up in the worship of Allah, she is included
among them. Similarly, two women who love each
other for the sake of Allah alone are also
included. Again, any woman who is invited to
illegal sexual intercourse by a man of nobility
and beauty and she refuses his advances, saying,
"I fear Allah," will be one of those in the
shade of Allah.
Any woman who gives in charity from her legal
earnings to the extent that her left hand does
not know what her right hand has given will be
included among them. If a woman remembers Allah
when she is alone by herself, she will be
included among them like any man. However, the
righteous leader is something specific for men.
Similarly, performing the prayers in
congregation in the mosque is something specific
for men. The prayer of the woman in her house is
more virtuous as has been stated in the
authentic Hadith of the Prophet (peace be upon
him).
Shaikh ibn Baz (www.islam-qa.com)
Click this link to
Preview all 30 Parts Online
Biography of Hafiz Ibn Kathir
Reasons For Buying Tafsir Ibn Kathir
|